The
subject of environmental violence can often be thought of or described in a
number of ways, and may additionally be attributed to a number of different
factors. However, one area of
environmental violence that may take on a more literal meaning of the term
deals with eco-terrorism. While eco-terrorism
is nothing new, I was actually pretty ignorant to this subject until watching If a Tree Falls, in GVPT273. But after seeing this documentary, I found
myself extremely curious about the world of environmental radicalism; not
because I wanted to be a part of this movement, but because many of the issues
that these people were fighting for were things that I also cared about, and I
simply didn’t understand what would push them to such violent extremes.
While
the term eco-terrorism is controversial in itself, I would like to focus the
topic of this blog on how this form of environmental violence ties into those
dealing with conflict or scarcity. It
seems that the idea of environmental violence often centers on issues occurring
within undeveloped States, and in many cases it can be thought of as the
product of scarcity or environmental degradation. Eco-terrorism, on the other hand, typically deals
with violence that is carried out in developed States, as a direct measure to
counter environmental degradation. In
most cases, acts of environmental radicalism occur on a local scale, usually in
response to domestic issues. And while it
may seem to have nothing to do with issues occurring within the underdeveloped
world, in some ways eco-terrorism can be thought of as a by-product of these
more traditional scenarios of environmental violence.
Although
this concept might be a bit of a stretch, it deals with the idea of consumerism
in the developed world fueling environmental violence occurring within the
undeveloped world. The indirect
relationship between eco-terrorism and traditional forms of environmental violence
is ultimately based on the economic ties that developed States have with
undeveloped States, whether it deals with importing or exporting natural
resources. A hypothetical example might
include an act of environmental violence taken upon a domestic oil corporation in
a developed country that acquires much of its supply from a poorer country that
deals with violence as a result of having such an abundant supply of oil. And while such a relationship is particularly
weak in most cases, in certain situations, this connection may be more
apparent.
No comments:
Post a Comment